|
|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 07:20:01
From: "Oscar Fuentes" <ofv_at_[hidden]>
> Right. As Gary Powell pointed out, that 'for_each' requirement is a
> misfeature.
AFAIK the current word on for_each is that it's allowed to change the state
of the elements of the sequence. It's non-mutating because the sequence
itself doesn't change, i.e. no elements are moved, copied, deleted, swapped.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk