Re: [boost] Better implementation of scope_ptr<>

From: Ruslan Zasukhin (sunshine_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 17:39:07

on 2/8/02 23:50, Howard Hinnant at hinnant_at_[hidden] wrote:

Hi Howard,

> I am gratified that you seem pleased with our library.  It is work that
> I am quite proud of.

Howard, do you work on MSL?
Great. Glad to hear you. :-)

> In your future posts to boost it might be better if you did not compare
> boost code to CodeWarrior.  This has two problems:
> 
> 1.  It potentially exposes our copyrighted material to people who have
> not paid to use it.

Accepted.

> 2.  You are posting to a very elite audience.  The people who invented
> things like auto_ptr are regulars here.  Believe me, they have thought
> about things like traits classes in smart pointers.  Saying "CodeWarrior
> does XXX better" without sufficient study and backing up is likely to
> offend more than educate.

I do not think that true elite can be offended by idea discussion. :-)

I don't know what they have think about, but using of traits here is really
better IMHO. (otherwise you will not include it into MSL).
Or traits really produce some problems ???

> Your cooperation in this area will be very much appreciated.  And thank
> you once again for supporting CodeWarrior.

Howard, I have question on effectiveness of using of find_if() and
predicates. Can I send to you this question off list?

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
-------------------------
Paradigma.
e-mail: ruslan_at_[hidden]
web   : http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list
send a letter to valentina-on_at_[hidden]