Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-09 08:05:42

Next message: James Kanze: "Re: [boost] Boost.Format syntax"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "g++ 2.95.3's STL breaks operator!="
Next in thread: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] ~scoped_ptr that allows incomplete types?"
Reply: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] ~scoped_ptr that allows incomplete types?"

I rather like John Maddock's scoped_ptr variant that has a static 'deleter'
member, enabling its destructor to do the right thing with incomplete types.

What do you think?

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.

Next message: James Kanze: "Re: [boost] Boost.Format syntax"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "g++ 2.95.3's STL breaks operator!="
Next in thread: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] ~scoped_ptr that allows incomplete types?"
Reply: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] ~scoped_ptr that allows incomplete types?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk