Re: [boost] Re: Boost Documentation Template questions

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-11 16:24:18

----- Original Message -----
From: "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>

> That's much more automation then I had in mind.  Would be nice, but
> it's well beyond the effort I'd care to put into it.

I can understand that.

> > How would the Python script you had in mind work?
>
> I just imagined it would replace the most common and frequent
> template "macros", such as {{author}} and {{library}}.  The other
> macros seemed to me like stuff that would require hand editing
> regardless of automation (because I hadn't considered doxygen style
> parsing of the source files), and so didn't really need any
> automation.  It's the common ones that are tedious busy work.

I'll send you my Reference section as it now stands. You may feel
differently then.

FWIW, Doxygen can generate XML. Somebody with some XML expertise ought to be
able to leverage this into extracting documentation structures. Sadly, I'm
not that guy.

-Dave