From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-12 03:42:49
--- In boost_at_y..., Kresimir Fresl <fresl_at_g...> wrote:
> jhrwalter wrote:
> > --- Peter Schmitteckert (boost) <boost_at_s...> wrote:
> >>-> Am I correct that this makes only sense for the dense
> >> numerics::unbounded_array memory shemes.
> > Currently yes.
> And why not for numerics::bounded_array and std::vector?
> (I know that standard does not guarantee that std::vector's
> storage is contiguous, but there is a defect report and AFAIK
> all current implementations use contiguous storage.)
On the second thought I realized, that you are right, especially
P.S.: Sorry for the delay.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk