Re: ublas & lapack

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-12 03:42:49

--- In boost_at_y..., Kresimir Fresl <fresl_at_g...> wrote:
>
> jhrwalter wrote:
>
> > --- Peter Schmitteckert (boost) <boost_at_s...> wrote:
>
> >>-> Am I correct that this makes only sense for the dense
> >>   numerics::unbounded_array memory shemes.
>
> > Currently yes.
>
>
> And why not for numerics::bounded_array and std::vector?
> (I know that standard does not guarantee that std::vector's
> storage is contiguous, but there is a defect report and AFAIK
> all current implementations use contiguous storage.)

On the second thought I realized, that you are right, especially 
w.r.t. numerics::bounded_array.

Regards

Joerg

P.S.: Sorry for the delay.

>
> fres