From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-12 14:42:51
From: "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_m...> wrote:
> > In particular, ::InterlockedXXX (Win32) and atomic_* (linux) are
> > to be memory barriers... if you can call that documentation but
> > another story.
> Huh? Win32 has no need for memory barriers and I'm unaware of any
> documentation indicating the Interlocked* methods are memory barriers.
Win32 runs on Alpha. IA-64 is not that permissive, too, although I did say
Win32, granted. :-)
As I said, if you can call that documentation. Linux is no better. Although
the intent is pretty clear.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk