From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-12 23:40:17
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 04:13, deane_yang wrote:
> > But that does not scale for
> > differential_number<N, double>::exp( x );
> Good point. And it looks pretty bad, doesn't it?
> As it happens, I personally only need the class up to order 2
> and have a hard time envisioning anyone needing it for higher
> order. Maybe we could just define the interface and leave the
> implementation of higher order functions to users who actually
> need them?
At least for a first attempt.
I have to think more about it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk