From: Jon Kalb (jonkalb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-14 11:50:52
I think the problem is that we need to recognize that the C++ committee may want to adopt "restrict" into C++ as well to maintain compatibility. I think it is just prudence to never use a C (or C++) keyword as an identifier even in a case where it is technically legal.
From: Daniel Frey [mailto:daniel.frey_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Finalizing a class
Bill Seymour wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote:
> > I ... can not see why it should be called 'key'.
> > Probably 'restrict'?
> Minor quibble: restrict is a keyword in C99.
I cannot see how this is a problem for a C++ class which simply isn't
legal C99 anyway...
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de Info: http://www.boost.org Send unsubscribe requests to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk