From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-18 07:46:16
While I don't want to stifle discussion of extensions, by any means, I also
hope that those of us attending the next committee meeting won't overlook
the fact that we have some really difficult issues open that could/should in
theory be fixed for the current standard. I'm thinking of LWG 225/226/229,
CWG 214/310, and probably others.
I hope that at our next meeting we'll be able to focus some real attention
on brainstorming solutions to these problems. It would be a shame if we
failed to address them by the time we start adding new features.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk