Re: [boost] Most needed/desired features in C++

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-18 07:46:16

While I don't want to stifle discussion of extensions, by any means, I also
hope that those of us attending the next committee meeting won't overlook
the fact that we have some really difficult issues open that could/should in
theory be fixed for the current standard. I'm thinking of LWG 225/226/229,
CWG 214/310, and probably others.

I hope that at our next meeting we'll be able to focus some real attention
on brainstorming solutions to these problems. It would be a shame if we
failed to address them by the time we start adding new features.

-Dave