Boost logo

Boost :

From: terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-16 19:06:34


--- In boost_at_y..., "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_m...> wrote:
[...]
> to think that the InterlockedExchange "optimized" mutex is either a
bit
> overoptimized, or I've done something wrong.
>
> Any insights, or results from multiprocessor machines or different
> compilers, are appreciated.

Why not just get rid of it (w/o any investigations) on the grounds of:

http://groups.google.com/groups?
as_umsgid=c29b5e33.0202140541.7df2bb9d%40posting.google.com

http://groups.google.com/groups?
as_umsgid=c29b5e33.0202150632.6d579f24%40posting.google.com

;-)

regards,
alexander.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk