|
Boost : |
From: joel de guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-18 12:28:48
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Frey"
IMHO, typeof() is really necessary, but auto is just eye-candy. I cannot
see something that an 'auto'-type can do you couldn't do with typeof()
and the current language. Instead, it weakens the strong-type-checking
for which I like C++. (I know my english is horrible, but I hope you get
what I mean :). If I missed something about 'auto', please let me know.
-------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, C++ strong-type-checking is not weakened in any way by the
proposal.
-Joel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk