Re: Most needed/desired features in C++

From: vesa_karvonen (vesa_karvonen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-19 06:43:30

--- In boost_at_y..., "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_u...> wrote:
> And of course, having gotten rid of implicit int, we don't need a
> keyword at all:
[...]
> Or even easier:
> 
>       operator+(t, s) {         // type of t and s are implicit
>         v = t+s;                // type of v is implicit 
>         return v;               // return type is implicit
>       }
> >

Have you considered this legal C++ syntax:

  return_type operator+(lhs_type, rhs_type)
  {
    //...
  }