Date: 2002-02-20 12:32:37
Author: gregod (gregod_at_[hidden]) at unix,mime
Date: 20/02/02 17:16
>> * I wonder if some of the names used in Boost.Signals are too common
>> for placing directly in namespace boost.
>I assume you're referring to 'connection' and 'trackable'?
>If so, I think the long-term goal should be to split the Signals library into
>two: a Tracking library and a Signals library. Everything related to tracking
>connections would become a part of the Tracking library, which the Signals
>library would use instead of having its own mechanism. Then it might not be
>so unreasonable for 'connection' and 'trackable' to be in the Boost namespace.
connection is far to general IMHO to live at namespace boost. The sockets
library will also need this as a class name and I could easily imagine that
geometry2d may also need it. It is too useful in too many contexts to live at
the top level.
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk