Re: More on auto

From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-21 10:37:41

--- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
[...]
> Conclusion:
> 
> We should think of an auto-type-deduction scheme that gives deduced-
types
> distinct names.
> So instead of: auto a = expr ;
> We should have: auto T a = exp ;
> 
> (Or:    template<class T> T a = exp; for that matter)
> 
> 
> Fernando Cacciola
> Sierra s.r.l.
> fcacciola_at_g...
> www.gosierra.com

I also think this better. I like template stile forms:

auto<T> a = ...
auto<typename T> a ... 
template<typename T> a ... - this look a bit strange since we are not 
defining template

Gennadiy.