Re: [boost] Re: Most needed/desired features in C++

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-21 10:58:52

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michiel Salters" <Michiel.Salters_at_[hidden]>

> Ah - it's matched equally well. I assumed they would have taken the
> same approach as with for-loop scoping. That is, if there is an
> unambiguous standard-conforming way to interpret it, use that. Else,
> try the extension to see if it compiles that way. 
> 
> Do you think this would be a safe & useful extension when implemented
> this way? 

I have no opinion :-)

taking-the-safe-road-ly y'rs,
Dave