From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-21 10:58:52
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michiel Salters" <Michiel.Salters_at_[hidden]>
> Ah - it's matched equally well. I assumed they would have taken the
> same approach as with for-loop scoping. That is, if there is an
> unambiguous standard-conforming way to interpret it, use that. Else,
> try the extension to see if it compiles that way.
> Do you think this would be a safe & useful extension when implemented
> this way?
I have no opinion :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk