Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-21 21:07:15

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Signals review"
Previous message: Darin Adler: "Signals review"
In reply to: rogeeff: "Re: type_traits: fixed is_POD, testing methodology questions"

----- Original Message -----
From: "rogeeff" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]>

> new Boost Test Library is also checking number of failures expected
> using less. Would you prefer equal?

Yes. If I fix a bug and the number of expected failures never gets reduced,
new bugs can be introduced without causing any tests to fail. That's bad.

-Dave

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Signals review"
Previous message: Darin Adler: "Signals review"
In reply to: rogeeff: "Re: type_traits: fixed is_POD, testing methodology questions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk