From: Steve M. Robbins (steven.robbins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-23 22:07:46
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:22:01PM -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> As I see it, these are the issues:
> * There are scalability problems with a configuration header of
> the ilk Boost uses. These scalability problems are why
> autoconf exists. It is apparent at this point, though, that
> the Boost maintainers do not feel that they're hitting the
> ceiling with the configuration header approach. So there is
> not motivation to move to autoconf or a similar tool on this
Boost *has* a script to generate a configuration header!
I was of the mistaken impression that this work was part of the old
build stuff that Boost was moving away from, but apparently that is
not the case. How about we work to polish it up?
-- by Rocket to the Moon, by Airplane to the Rocket, by Taxi to the Airport, by Frontdoor to the Taxi, by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ... - They Might Be Giants
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk