From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-25 11:37:07
From: "Braden McDaniel" <braden_at_[hidden]>
> On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 06:36, Peter Dimov wrote:
> > From: "Braden McDaniel" <braden_at_[hidden]>
> > * Installation
> > > * If my open source project depends on Boost, how am I
> > > to tell my users to install Boost?
> > This is pretty easy. You tell them to add -I ~/boost to the command
> > :-)
Weak or not, it works.
> And this does not facilitate the creation of binary packages for
> boost the way a "make install" does. RPMs are a lot easier to make and
> maintain if a package has a sane "make install". Ideally, Boost binary
> packages would be included with my users' OS distributions. That won't
> happen overnight, but "make install" is a way of oiling the gears.
I don't see why it's necessary to have a 'make install' in order to make a
boost RPM, but it must be my ignorance.
> There needs to be a "standard" place that Boost lives on systems. Only
> users who install Boost to a nonstandard prefix should have to worry
> about explicitly chasing it down every time they build a project that
> depends on it.
I don't remember anybody arguing against that. Users are free to unpack
boost in whatever place is considered standard on their platform.
> > Either that, or _your_ configure script does that automatically.
> > (configure --with-boost=~/boost, defaults to
> > $(my_open_src_project_root)/include/boost, presumably.)
> So you're suggesting it's reasonable for me to include a copy of Boost
> in my project's distribution? Try again.
Yes, I am suggesting exactly that. Some projects will include a copy of the
version of Boost (minus .jpg/.pdf/whatever files) against which they've been
Other projects will prefer not to include a copy of Boost.
Either way, it's ./configure --with-boost[=location], with the appropriate
> It bloats my project's
> distribution and, more importantly, it's a maintenance nightmare.
Not including boost may turn out to be a maintenance nightmare as well.
(Although we try hard to ensure that releases are backward compatible, slips
Anyway, it's your choice.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk