From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-26 09:02:11
> One thing I don't see explicit mentioned here is the concept of a monotonic
> clock as per IEEE Std 1003.1-2001. Is a clock type which deals with elapsed
> time and is unaffected by changes to the system time supported?
Yes agreed. Seems like this would be mostly an issue for the threading library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk