From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 06:50:47
----- Original Message -----
From: "quendezus" <quendez_at_[hidden]>
In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> > There are much worse problems with operator>>() than that one, IMO.
> How do
> > you unserialize an object with no default constructor?
> > -Dave
> Do you think deserialization of objects with no default constructor
> should be a requirement?
Yes. However I don't have to do serialization so often; maybe my opinion
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk