From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 15:49:29
----- Original Message -----
From: "braden_mcdaniel" <braden_at_[hidden]>
> --- In boost_at_y..., Rene Rivera <grafik666_at_r...> wrote:
> > Takign a look at what other source type programs do (gcc, emacs,
> perl, etc.).
> Don't look at what other programs do; look at what other *libraries* do.
> > It seems that versioning the subdirectories under a common prefix
> location is
> > a workable practice. Would then something like the following work
> for us?
> > $prefix/include/boost/1.27.0/boost/.../*.hpp
> > $prefix/lib/boost/1.27.0/*.(a,so)
> > $prefix/share/boost/1.27.0/tools/build/*.jam
> That's offensive.
Please try to keep extreme pronouncements out of the discussion. This sort
of thing just causes static and doesn't help at all.
> Why would you do this? The versioning "problem" is solved by autoconf
> and libtool.
> If someone wants to install multiple boost versions on their system at
> once, the solution is simple: don't put them under the same prefix.
That's not a very smooth solution for those who need to test against
multiple versions. Having a version number under a common prefix really
simplifies configuration: it means you don't need to explicitly specify an
installation directory for each version you want to test against.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk