Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-03 06:52:37

>John's approach is probably better. But there should be a comment
>explaining why it is being done - if someone just casually glanced at the
>code they might think it was a mistake and remove it.

On second thought, in most cases couldn't BOOST_TEST be used instead of
assert - I realise this involves some reworking of old code, but it might
be worth it in the long run?

- John Maddock

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at