From: Jan Langer (jan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-03 17:26:54
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Beman Dawes wrote:
>And I'm not either, particularly for most of the attributes, which may vary
>from system to system.
>But there are a few basic attributes (name, directory path, full path and
>is_directory) which IMO should be required, and should be accessible with
>very straightforward syntax. Otherwise people will make mistakes, write
>non-portable code, and it will get messy.
one question: is the directory_entry and the attribute cache the same
object in your approach? and if yes, why? if no, i am convinced and do
agree with it.
-- jan langer ... jan_at_[hidden] "pi ist genau drei"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk