From: rwgk (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-06 22:16:56
--- In boost_at_y..., Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_t...> wrote:
> I can sympathize with that gripe. I'm sure I'll draw heat for this
> remark but it boils down to the decision that double() means zero
> initialize instead of uninitialized. Imho that one was big a
> and I see no way of backing out of it completely.
I could not agree more. As it stands, because of problems like
that, doing numerics with C++ feels like being imprisoned on
Alcatraz, in a cell with a direct view of the San Francisco
skyline. The good life is so close, but how can I get there?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk