From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-08 07:04:51
From: "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
> > I'm not sure I follow what you mean here. How does "top-level
> root" compare
> > to "/" in a Posix filesystem?
> root_directory() just returns a "name" that represents the systems
> root "directory". Above you claim that you want this directory
> to "return" just '/', which indicates to me that '/' is the only
> entry in the "directory" returned from root_directory(). This makes
> it a "logical/psuedo/whatever" directory in the same sense that
> a "root" directory in a DOS like system would be if we follow Beman's
> suggestion. I'm not claiming to agree with this, I'm just trying to
> follow the logic in the posting.
The problem is simply that there is no such thing as a 'root' directory (in
a portable world.) Under Windows, you can use \\192.168.0.1\sharename and
access the whole Internet if you like.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk