From: Damien Fisher (damien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-10 16:56:46
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Jeff Garland wrote:
> The default rounding mode selection by macro is odd to me. I would much rather
> see the policy-based template implementation you reject later in the paper. To
> me one additional template parameter is much easier to understand for the user
> than a 'macro' parameter. I would be fine with having to 'cast' decimals with
> different rounding modes to a compatible type to perform operations.
While I haven't looked at this submission, if this hasn't changed since
Bill's last submission, I have big problems with this too. It seems to me
that using a macro could very easily lead to violations of the ODR. Plus,
it just isn't very C++-ish :).
(Sorry if this is a different issue in this submission)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk