From: Jason Stewart (res0054p_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-12 12:24:44
>Dave Abrahams and I think a newsgroup is worth pressing for, and I'm going
>to coordinate the effort.
>Q. Open to the public or limited to Boost members?
>A. Limited to Boost members. The best of all worlds would be a single
>signup for the mailing list would also enable newsgroup posting. (Limited
>to members seems to me so worthwhile as to be worth a lot of effort to get
The latest version of INN can use a python or perl script to authenticate
against a database or other means. It should be easy to check that against
a list somewhere. This can control reading and posting.
>Q. How do we prevent spam and other off-topic posts to the newsgroup?
>A. Depend on "limited to members" to stop most of the problem posts. The
>key would be to use the same policies for the newsgroups as for the list.
>(In other words, intercept newsgroup postings, and forward them to the list
>only. If the message is accepted for posting on the list, then it will be
>automatically gated to the newsgroup. The reality may be a lot messier.)
The above should take care of this. If only members are allowed to
read/post then spammers would have to join which they are unlikely to do.
>Q. How do we prevent spammers from harvesting email addresses from
>A. Given the answers to the questions above, harvesting is less likely, but
>still possible. Mailman has an option to "Hide the sender of a message,
>replacing it with the list address", but warns this may be annoying as
>headers no longer show the name of the actual poster. Seems to be it would
>be better to remove the poster's email address, but not name. I'll check to
>see if that is possible.
Same as above. They could not read the messages unless they had permission.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk