From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-13 17:50:45
From: "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
> Sorry, you're right. One of these days I'll learn to think through
> before posting ;). But, as you point out, both error codes are
> identical in usefullness. There's not much logic behind returning an
> error here, as you can't really do anything useful at that point.
Well, you can at least terminate the process (although perhaps not in an orderly way) - probably better than leaving
threads in some undefined limbo-state...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk