Re: Standardization of Boost libraries

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-14 05:17:30

--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> At 09:24 AM 3/7/2002, Toon Knapen wrote:
> 
>  >I'm using ublas now very intensively and I'm very satisfied.
>  >Currently, I'm using ublas in a elastic FE benchmark and it looks 
I'm
>  >on par with the fastest fortran codes.
>  >So I really would like it to be proposed in one of the next 
meetings.
> 
> While anyone is free to propose a library directly to the committee 
without 
> first going through a Boost formal review, the only commitment from 
the 
> Boost LWG members is to bring Boost libraries before the committee.
> 
> So you need to convince the ublas developers to bring it up for 
formal 
> review:-)

Due to time constraints on our side the earliest possible date for a 
review is midyear. I'm unsure, if ublas conforms to the boost library 
submission guidelines even then: we have currently no clue, what we 
should change w.r.t. the guidelines. Furthermore I believe our 
primary task until then is to enhance the testing options for the 
library.
 
> 
> --Beman
 
Regards
 
Joerg