From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-14 05:17:30
--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> At 09:24 AM 3/7/2002, Toon Knapen wrote:
> >I'm using ublas now very intensively and I'm very satisfied.
> >Currently, I'm using ublas in a elastic FE benchmark and it looks
> >on par with the fastest fortran codes.
> >So I really would like it to be proposed in one of the next
> While anyone is free to propose a library directly to the committee
> first going through a Boost formal review, the only commitment from
> Boost LWG members is to bring Boost libraries before the committee.
> So you need to convince the ublas developers to bring it up for
Due to time constraints on our side the earliest possible date for a
review is midyear. I'm unsure, if ublas conforms to the boost library
submission guidelines even then: we have currently no clue, what we
should change w.r.t. the guidelines. Furthermore I believe our
primary task until then is to enhance the testing options for the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk