From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 02:15:01
--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> At 05:17 AM 3/14/2002, jhrwalter wrote:
> >Due to time constraints on our side the earliest possible date
> >review is midyear. I'm unsure, if ublas conforms to the boost
> >submission guidelines even then: we have currently no clue, what
> >should change w.r.t. the guidelines. Furthermore I believe our
> >primary task until then is to enhance the testing options for the
> When convenient to your schedule, but before asking for a formal
> you might ask on the Boost list for members willing to do a quick
> see if they spot any problems.
So I would like to ask the members of the Boost list, if somebody is
willing to do a quick scan over ublas and propose improvements w.r.t.
the library submission guidelines.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk