Re: ublas and guidelines [was: Standardization of Boost libraries]

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 02:15:01

--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> At 05:17 AM 3/14/2002, jhrwalter wrote:
> 
>  >Due to time constraints on our side the earliest possible date 
for a
>  >review is midyear. I'm unsure, if ublas conforms to the boost 
library
>  >submission guidelines even then: we have currently no clue, what 
we
>  >should change w.r.t. the guidelines. Furthermore I believe our
>  >primary task until then is to enhance the testing options for the
>  >library.
> 
> When convenient to your schedule, but before asking for a formal 
review, 
> you might ask on the Boost list for members willing to do a quick 
scan to 
> see if they spot any problems.

> 
> --Beman
 
So I would like to ask the members of the Boost list, if somebody is 
willing to do a quick scan over ublas and propose improvements w.r.t. 
the library submission guidelines.
 
TIA
 
Joerg