|
|
Boost : |
From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 07:18:17
On Monday 18 March 2002 08:13, you wrote:
> Ok, if all agree, that it would be useful to have std::valarray as
> another array_type option, I'll try to add some traits logic to
> support it at least under the more standard conforming compilers.
Is there an advantage using valarray as the container ? Do compilers know
some optimisations on valarray which they not perform on other containers ?
AFAICT, valarray is poorly adopted.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk