From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 15:38:38
At 11:55 AM 3/18/2002, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:
>> it's only that this epic scope could prevent lambda
>> > being added to the standard library.
>Agreed, BLL exception handling etc. are probably not features I'd
>suggest to be added to the standard library. For standard library,
>some branches would obviously get chopped away - for boost, I think
>it's ok to have a richer set of features.
That's true, but even on Boost a somewhat bloated library will turn off
some users. (That's just a general comment, not a specific opinion that
you should remove anything from the lambda library.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk