Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-21 07:50:27

> > I can understand why the behavior would be useful for references, but I
> > still can't understand it for arrays. A pointer-to-an-array is a
> > well-defined concept, but maybe there's something I'm missing here:

 Well I never knew that - I thought a pointer to an array was a pointer to
 the underlying type, but after some investigation you are quite right -
 get this fixed, thanks.

 John Maddock

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at