Re: [boost] Review: lambda library

From: Paul Baxter (paul.baxter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-22 16:16:56

Can Joel comment now about his intentions?
That seems like it might clear some of the confusion surrounding this.

Is the license likely to be outside the bounds of Boost's requirements?
Does Joel et al have a desire to submit to boost with its attendant coding
guidelenes etc.?

Paul Baxter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Powell" <powellg_at_[hidden]>
> -------------------------------
> Concretely, Phoenix seems to be reaching this goal. Yes, Phoenix is not
> ready for submitting to Boost yet, and Joel has not stated whether this
> is his intention or not. Therefore this alone is not enough to dismiss a
> mature library with a different scope, because there is a real risk that
> an alleged better option will never be submitted for Boost.