From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-25 14:12:21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> >2) I don't think that the tests in status/Jamfile should be included
> >default from the top level Jamfile - for one thing if a user just
> >build the boost libraries, they may not want to stick around while
> >of test cases build (something that can take some time), for another
> >current status/Jamfile implementation results in quite a number of
> >errors scrolling past the screen (see below).
> Yes, I've also run into that. The top level Jamfile shouldn't do
> regression tests by default. I almost pulled it out, but then didn't
> because I'm not the maintainer of the top level Jamfile. The
> (Dave?) might to make regression testing conditional, rather than
> it out altogether.
I just pulled it out.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk