From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-27 07:01:28
From: "Jaakko Jarvi" <jajarvi_at_[hidden]>
> 2) The outermost return type deduction layer in LL works as
> return_type<Functor, argument_types>::type
> whereas in Phoenix the scheme introduced in FC++ is used:
> Both are equally powerful,
No, they are not. You can't add a return_type nested template to a
third-party (or stdlib) function object. LL's approach is better.
> Strict/weak arity, etc. are interface issues and can go either way in
> either library, it's a matter of agreeing (and people seem to strongly
> believe in weakness).
Why do people insist on calling it "weak" arity? There is nothing weak about
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk