From: John Maddock (john_maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-28 07:13:52
Thanks, changes made,
> A third point that could be changed. Does anyone know why the line
> //# define BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_CONST
> is in the header? A commented out definition is really very confusing.
> Is there any case when this definition is required?
Probably it was a "tentative change", since no-one has complained I'll
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk