From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-04 00:53:17
Paul Mensonides wrote:
> Sorry if this was already covered (I'm new here.), but what
> specifically is the problem? Is it the output of preprocessor
> in these 'linearization' types of expansion all being on one
> huge line and a real pain to debug?
Yep, that's one side of what we are discussing. Here's the beginning of the
thread - http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg27726.php.
Basically, we are trying to come up with a best way to utilize powerful
capabilities of Vesa Karvonen's PREPROCESSOR library
(http://www.boost.org/libs/preprocessor/doc/index.htm) without imposing the
downsides of preprocessor-based code generation (such as "real pain to
debug" :) on users of our libraries (and, of course, ourselves).
> If that's it, I have some ideas from my own stuff.
I am interested.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk