From: William Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-05 13:02:36
> > In any event, if I could portably provide an implementation that gave
> > same id as the native tools, I'd do so. But I don't think I can do this
> > with POSIX.
>OK, then we can probably live with Beman's suggestion:
>"Type thread_id must meet the requirements given here, but is otherwise
>implementation defined. Implementations are encouraged to give thread_id
>the same type and values as in the underlying native thread system, if
>That sounds quite reasonable to me. What do you think?
I agree with the statement, but the implication for Boost.Threads is that
POSIX won't behave the way you want because I can't portably do so. Which
is unfortunate, since on most systems pthread_t is a type that we could do
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk