From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-05 15:22:27
--- "David A. Greene" <greened_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>I'm in the midst of designing some classes with lots of
>policies. I like the approach the iterator_adaptor
>library uses to present a usable interface to classes
>with many policies.
>I'm wondering if it would be possible to create a
>generic library to provide named template parameters.
>Is this a worthwhile endeavor? Of course a lot of
>code exists in the iterator_adaptor detail namespace,
>but it is tied to the specific policies that
>Is this a good idea or is there a better way?
>"Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music,
> and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I also think that named template parameters worth separating into library. It brings valueable functionality that could be reused.
A free email account your friends will never forget!
Get YOURNAME_at_[hidden] at http://www.emailaccount.com/
Run a small business? Then you need professional email like you_at_[hidden] from Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net?tag
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk