From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-09 12:45:00
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 01:18 PM, John Maddock wrote:
>> I want to support this proposal. At the moment I always patch
>> those boost files which rely on exceptions to get a second
>> set of exception-free files for the same reason. The two main
>> libraries I patch that way are smart pointers and lexical_cast.
> I introduced BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS for exactly that, only regex supports
> it as
> yet as far as I know - would you like to submit parches for the smart
> pointers and/or lexical_cast libs?
I see in regex that you always abort when an exception would be thrown.
This is also an acceptable behavior in my applications and I guess
the only consistent behavior. If there are no better ideas, I'll clean
up my patches and submit them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk