From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-09 20:16:37
At 11:08 AM 4/9/2002, Terence Wilson wrote:
>LOL, I'm sure Peter gets weary of answering this one- I asked it a
>while ago. What are the chances of boost::bind being accepted to
>the standard along with shared_ptr etc? The answer is probably
>arcane, but can someone provide rough answer? I hope it goes
IMO, A lot depends on Boost developers being able to present the
standards committee with a coherent roadmap to take us from the current
standard to a better world with much easier to use function objects.
I'm worried we will just confuse the committee (translation: I'm a bit
confused myself) if we just present parts of the puzzle like bind
without having a roadmap showing the steps to a complete solution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk