From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 10:28:27
Peter Dimov wrote:
> I'm not entirely convinced that we should add compiler-specific tests...
Hmm, if the assignment shouldn't compile what's wrong with a test that
does verify that it does not compile indeed.
I can see nothing compiler-specific here besides the fact that a compiler
managed to fail the test before the code was changed.
> What do others think?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk