Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 20:23:51

At 07:37 AM 4/10/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:

>My suggestion is to add boost::bind (and boost::function, 'cause the
>two combined are more than a sum of the parts) in the current
>of libraries for consideration. Let the committee know about Lambda,
>but allow them the option to reject the big picture without
>necessarily rejecting bind.
>I (user hat on) do want to get a standard lambda library, but at the
>same time, I'll settle for a standard bind if this is the only
>thing that has a chance to pass through the committee.

OK, we'll do it that way. Bind and Function now, with a heads-up that
lambda may come along later, but that should not affect thinking about
Bind and Function.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at