From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 20:23:51
At 07:37 AM 4/10/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>My suggestion is to add boost::bind (and boost::function, 'cause the
>two combined are more than a sum of the parts) in the current
>of libraries for consideration. Let the committee know about Lambda,
>but allow them the option to reject the big picture without
>necessarily rejecting bind.
>I (user hat on) do want to get a standard lambda library, but at the
>same time, I'll settle for a standard bind if this is the only
>thing that has a chance to pass through the committee.
OK, we'll do it that way. Bind and Function now, with a heads-up that
lambda may come along later, but that should not affect thinking about
Bind and Function.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk