Re: [boost] std::bind (Was: Using mem_fn with adaptors)

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 20:23:51

At 07:37 AM 4/10/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:

 >My suggestion is to add boost::bind (and boost::function, 'cause the
 >two combined are more than a sum of the parts) in the current 
"package"
 >of libraries for consideration. Let the committee know about Lambda,
 >but allow them the option to reject the big picture without
 >necessarily rejecting bind.
 >
 >I (user hat on) do want to get a standard lambda library, but at the
 >same time, I'll settle for a standard bind if this is the only
 >thing that has a chance to pass through the committee.

OK, we'll do it that way.  Bind and Function now, with a heads-up that 
lambda may come along later, but that should not affect thinking about 
Bind and Function.

--Beman