Re: [boost] Re: Re: Adding Loki to Boost (reprise)

From: j.adelman_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-04-16 04:33:00

Quoting Andrei Alexandrescu 
<andrewalex_at_[hidden]>:

> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote 
in message
> news:00a401c1e501$7f4d60b0
$6501a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...
> > > BTW, I didn't notice whether David caught 
this one up - a couple
> of
> > > code samples use implicit int throughout.
> >
> > do you mean that functions fail to declare a 
return type?
> 
> No, there are some "unsigned"s not followed 
by "int".
> 
> Andrei

Why is that a problem?  It is permitted and 
unambiguous, no more problematic than using long 
to mean long int.

James 

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through UK Online webmail