Boost logo

Boost :

From: j.adelman_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-04-16 04:33:00


Quoting Andrei Alexandrescu
<andrewalex_at_[hidden]>:

> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote
in message
> news:00a401c1e501$7f4d60b0
$6501a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...
> > > BTW, I didn't notice whether David caught
this one up - a couple
> of
> > > code samples use implicit int throughout.
> >
> > do you mean that functions fail to declare a
return type?
>
> No, there are some "unsigned"s not followed
by "int".
>
> Andrei

Why is that a problem? It is permitted and
unambiguous, no more problematic than using long
to mean long int.

James

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through UK Online webmail


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk