[boost] Re: Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 12:37:49

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:a9mvl9$ffe$2_at_main.gmane.org...
> [...]
> Do you think Loki::SmartPtr's policy approach can (or should) handle
> these variations well, or would you recommend a different approach?

I'm not sure why my newsreader decided to post this three times, but I
apologize (on behalf of OE, which annoys me more and more by the
day).

Dave