[boost] Re: Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 16:39:04

"David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:015701c1e6e0$d7029ce0$6501a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...

> There's no arguing with what works. This is one reason we really need to
> get a policy-based smart pointer into boost. While I think it's
> unreasonable for any one person to take on being a project "lead" for
> integrating all of Loki, this is one piece which would be incredibly
> valuable, and, I believe, feasible. I don't think it needs to be a
> veteran Booster; it's much more important that the person have a
> personal stake in the project (i.e. needs the functionality for his own
> work). I hope that someone (like you ;->) will take Andrei up on it.

I'd love to take on the SmartPtr work, but I can't - it'd detract too
seriously from the work that pays the bills, unfortunately.

-cd