Re: [boost] Re: policy-based smart pointers are EVIL!

From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-19 08:16:20

In-Reply-To: <904AA220ACB4D211A10600104B3E85C92A82C7_at_MAIL>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:14:54 +0200  (DKl_at_[hidden]) wrote:
> I think that something like this can be achieved in a form which
> requires configuration of [root] base classes only

I hope we don't lose the ability to write:

    class Impl;
    
    smart_ptr<Impl> pImpl;

In other words, smart pointers to incomplete types. We may not know what 
Impl's base class is.

-- Dave Harris