[boost] Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-19 09:54:51

<DKl_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:904AA220ACB4D211A10600104B3E85C92A82C9_at_MAIL...
> Still, I claim that making 'shared_ptr<T>' and 'intrusive_ptr<T>'
> different types *and* suggesting their use in interfaces (I don't
care
> about internal operations: this is subject to the implementer of the
> component) is a bad idea.

I'm not sure what you are suggesting. At the end of the day, they
_will_ be different types, be it through specialization or whatever.

Andrei