From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-19 11:13:32
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> From: "Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]>
> > Could we list again issues preventing current Loki::SmartPtr to be
> It wasn't proposed. We can't accept things that weren't proposed. ;-)
I just looking for some argeement.
> > It seems that a lot of people desperatly need such facility.
> I question this claim. Loki::SmartPtr is there. It's free. Anyone
> "desperate" can simply use it. Renaming Loki to boost and SmartPtr to
> smart_ptr adds nothing of value.
It does not work for me. Plus it has a lot of issues (see my other post).
BTW I did not say that we just neet t orename it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk